Question 1 · Hard
A 26-year-old woman develops a proximal deep vein thrombosis 4 months after starting a combined oral contraceptive. Her mother had a pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. A sample taken before any heparin was given shows: antithrombin activity (factor Xa-based) 47% (reference 80-120%), antithrombin antigen 49% (80-120%), protein C activity 98% (70-140%), free protein S antigen 84% (60-130%), APC-resistance ratio 2.6 (normal above 2.0) and factor VIII 118% (50-150%). Over the next 2 days she needs unusually high doses of unfractionated heparin before her APTT reaches the therapeutic range. Which conclusion best explains both the thrombosis and the poor heparin response?
- AAntithrombin lowered by heparin therapy
- BHeparin resistance from a raised factor VIII
- CType I (quantitative) antithrombin deficiency
- DType II antithrombin deficiency (heparin-binding site)
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · Type I (quantitative) antithrombin deficiency
Antithrombin activity and antigen are both reduced to about half, in proportion, which defines a type I (quantitative) deficiency; her mother's event fits autosomal dominant inheritance. Heparin works mainly by speeding up antithrombin's inactivation of thrombin and factor Xa, so with half the normal antithrombin much more heparin is needed to prolong the APTT. A type II defect, such as a heparin-binding-site variant, gives a low activity with a normal antigen. Heparin itself can lower antithrombin, but this sample was taken before heparin, and factor VIII, the usual cause of acute-phase heparin resistance, is normal. The deficiency should be confirmed on a repeat sample once the acute event and anticoagulation are over.
- A: The sample was taken before heparin, so heparin cannot have lowered it.
- B: Factor VIII is normal, so it cannot explain the heparin resistance.
- D: A type II defect has a normal antigen with a low activity; here both are low.