Question 1 · Hard
A 30-year-old man is brought to casualty after a fight. A 5 cm linear wound over the scalp looks clean-cut at first glance, but a hand lens shows slightly bruised, abraded margins, and threads of tissue cross the floor of the wound. What weapon most likely caused it?
- AA blunt weapon such as a lathi
- BA firearm discharged from close range
- CA pointed weapon such as a dagger
- DA sharp-edged weapon such as a knife
Show answerHide answer
Answer: A · A blunt weapon such as a lathi
Blunt force over a bone close to the skin, such as the scalp, can split the skin in a straight line and mimic an incised wound. The bruised, abraded edges and the tissue bridges of nerves, vessels and fibres across the floor show that the tissues were torn, not cut, so it is a lacerated wound. Calling it incised would wrongly suggest a sharp weapon and change the police case. The injury report must describe the margins, bridging and dimensions exactly, as these support the legal classification of hurt under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
- B: A close-range firearm wound shows blackening or tattooing around a round defect.
- C: A pointed weapon makes a stab wound that is deeper than it is long.
- D: Sharp-edged weapons give clean, unbruised margins with no tissue bridges.