Question 1 · Hard
A 2-day-old baby born at 36 weeks is feeding poorly and has an unstable temperature. The analyzer, which has no nRBC channel, reports WBC 22.0 × 10^9/L. The 100-cell differential shows segmented neutrophils 40%, bands 14%, metamyelocytes 4%, myelocytes 2%, lymphocytes 30% and monocytes 10%, and 10 nRBCs are seen per 100 white cells. The neonatal unit treats an immature-to-total neutrophil (I:T) ratio above 0.2 as suggesting sepsis. Which pair of results is correct?
- ACorrected WBC 22.0 × 10^9/L; I:T ratio 0.33
- BCorrected WBC 19.8 × 10^9/L; I:T ratio 0.50
- CCorrected WBC 20.0 × 10^9/L; I:T ratio 0.33
- DCorrected WBC 20.0 × 10^9/L; I:T ratio 0.23
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · Corrected WBC 20.0 × 10^9/L; I:T ratio 0.33
The analyzer has counted the nRBCs as white cells, so the corrected WBC is 22.0 × 100 ÷ (100 + 10) = 20.0 × 10^9/L. The I:T ratio divides all immature neutrophils (bands, metamyelocytes and myelocytes: 14 + 4 + 2 = 20) by all neutrophils, mature and immature (40 + 20 = 60), giving 0.33, above the unit's 0.2 cut-off. Because the ratio uses percentages from the same differential, the nRBC correction does not change it. Using bands alone gives 0.23, dividing the immature cells by the segmented neutrophils alone gives 0.50, and subtracting 10% of the WBC instead of dividing by 1.10 gives 19.8.
- A: 22.0 is the uncorrected count, which still includes the nRBCs.
- B: Divide by 1.10 rather than subtract 10%, and divide by all neutrophils.
- D: 0.23 uses bands alone; metamyelocytes and myelocytes are also immature.