Question 1 · Hard
A healthy 47-year-old man has a routine CBC on an analyzer that sorts white cells by light scatter after a cytochemical peroxidase stain and also has a separate lobularity channel. Results: WBC 6.9 × 10^3/µL (6.9 × 10^9/L); peroxidase channel: neutrophils 5%, lymphocytes 31%, monocytes 4%, eosinophils 2%, large peroxidase-negative cells 58%. The lobularity channel counts 64% polymorphonuclear cells. Hemoglobin and platelets are normal, the sample is 2 hours old, and the controls and other patients on the run are normal. The blood film shows 63% mature segmented neutrophils with normal granules and no blasts. What is the most likely explanation?
- ABlasts missed on the blood film
- BFailure of the peroxidase reagent
- CInherited myeloperoxidase deficiency
- DNeutrophil aging in a delayed sample
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · Inherited myeloperoxidase deficiency
The two channels disagree: the lobularity channel and the film both show about 63% normal segmented neutrophils, but the peroxidase channel places these cells among the large peroxidase-negative cells. Neutrophils that lack myeloperoxidase do not take up the stain, so they fall in the region the analyzer uses for blasts and atypical lymphocytes. Eosinophils use a different enzyme, eosinophil peroxidase, so they still stain, which fits inherited myeloperoxidase deficiency, a common and usually harmless trait. Blasts are excluded by the film, a delayed sample by the 2-hour age, and a reagent fault by the normal controls and other patients. Report the film differential with a comment so the finding is not mistaken for leukemia.
- A: The film shows mature neutrophils and no blasts, in agreement with the lobularity channel.
- B: A reagent fault would also affect the controls and the other patients on the run.
- D: The sample is only 2 hours old, and aging does not remove peroxidase from every neutrophil.