Question 1 · Hard
A 32-year-old woman who takes an oral contraceptive has abdominal pain and new ascites, and imaging shows hepatic vein thrombosis. Results: Hb 13.6 g/dL [136 g/L], Hct 41% [0.41 L/L], WBC 9.6 × 10^3/µL [9.6 × 10^9/L], platelets 362 × 10^3/µL [362 × 10^9/L] and reticulocytes 1.2%; the spleen is enlarged. LD and haptoglobin are normal, PNH flow cytometry finds no GPI-deficient cells, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A are not detected, and antiphospholipid antibodies are negative. JAK2 V617F is detected at an allele burden of 9%. What is the best interpretation of these results?
- AUnderlying myeloproliferative neoplasm
- BParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
- CA false-positive JAK2 result
- DThrombosis from the contraceptive alone
Show answerHide answer
Answer: A · Underlying myeloproliferative neoplasm
JAK2 V617F is found in a large share of patients with hepatic or portal vein thrombosis, and in this setting it points to an underlying myeloproliferative neoplasm even when the blood counts look normal. The counts can be held down by an enlarged spleen that pools cells, by the larger plasma volume of portal hypertension, and by bleeding or iron deficiency, so the usual raised hematocrit or platelet count may be missing. A negative PNH test, a normal LD and haptoglobin and negative inherited and antiphospholipid tests make the JAK2 result the key finding. An oral contraceptive adds risk but does not explain a clonal JAK2 mutation, and low allele burdens are typical in this setting. A marrow biopsy then helps classify the neoplasm.
- B: PNH flow cytometry finds no GPI-deficient cells, and there is no hemolysis.
- C: A 9% allele burden is a real clonal result; low burdens are typical in splanchnic vein thrombosis.
- D: The contraceptive adds risk, but it does not explain a clonal JAK2 mutation.