Question 1 · Hard
A 27-year-old man has had painless, enlarged posterior cervical lymph nodes for 3 weeks. Toxoplasma IgM is positive and Toxoplasma IgG is 160 IU/mL. An IgG avidity ELISA is run in two pairs of wells: after the serum binds, one pair is washed with buffer and the other with 6 mol/L urea before the enzyme conjugate is added. Mean absorbance: buffer-washed wells 1.60; urea-washed wells 0.32. The kit calculates the avidity index as urea OD divided by buffer OD, times 100, and reports below 30% as low, 30-40% as borderline and above 40% as high; high avidity excludes infection in the past 4 months. The avidity result and its interpretation are:
- A20%: high avidity, over 4 months ago
- B500%: index invalid, repeat test
- C20%: low avidity, may be recent
- D80%: high avidity, over 4 months ago
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · 20%: low avidity, may be recent
The avidity index is 0.32 / 1.60 x 100 = 20%, which the kit calls low. Urea breaks the weaker bonds of low-avidity IgG made early in a primary response; as the response matures over months, IgG binds more tightly and stays bound through the urea wash. A low index fits a recent infection, matching the positive IgM and the lymphadenitis, but low avidity can persist for months, so it supports rather than proves recent infection; only high avidity is used to exclude it. The 80% answer comes from calculating the fraction washed off instead of the fraction left, and 500% comes from inverting the ratio.
- A: A low index means low avidity, because most IgG washed off.
- B: 500% comes from dividing the buffer OD by the urea OD.
- D: 80% is the fraction removed by urea, not the fraction left bound.