Question 1 · Hard
A 38-year-old man was treated with benzathine penicillin for secondary syphilis 3 years ago. His RPR fell from 1:128 at diagnosis to nonreactive by 12 months and was still nonreactive at a check 14 months ago. A recent sexual partner has now been diagnosed with primary syphilis; he has no symptoms. The laboratory uses the reverse sequence algorithm, and today his treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) is reactive, with a signal-to-cutoff ratio of 18 (reactive at 1.0 or more). Which result will show whether he has been reinfected?
- AA TP-PA on the same sample
- BThe CIA signal-to-cutoff ratio
- CA quantitative RPR compared with his last
- DA treponemal IgM immunoassay
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · A quantitative RPR compared with his last
Treponemal antibodies usually stay detectable for life after treatment, so in a person with treated syphilis the reactive CIA is expected and says nothing about a new infection. Nontreponemal titers reflect disease activity: his RPR became nonreactive after treatment, so a newly reactive RPR, or a fourfold rise over his last titer, would show reinfection. In the reverse algorithm, a reactive treponemal screen is always followed by an RPR, titrated when reactive, and here that titer is the only informative result. A TP-PA would simply be reactive again, and the CIA ratio is not used to judge disease activity. Because his partner has primary syphilis, he should also be treated presumptively even if today's RPR is nonreactive.
- A: TP-PA stays reactive after treatment, so it cannot separate old from new infection.
- B: The signal-to-cutoff ratio is not used to judge disease activity or reinfection.
- D: Treponemal IgM tests are not recommended for adults and do not reliably show reinfection.