Question 1 · Hard
A 31-year-old man taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis has screening for sexually transmitted infections every 3 months. Nine months ago his treponemal enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was nonreactive, and his visits at 6 and 3 months ago were missed. Today: treponemal EIA reactive; RPR reactive at 1:32; HIV antigen/antibody nonreactive. He has no history of syphilis or its treatment. A full examination of the skin, mouth, genitals and anus finds no ulcer, rash or mucosal lesion and no enlarged lymph nodes, and neurologic and eye examinations are normal. His infection is best staged as:
- AEarly latent syphilis
- BLate latent syphilis
- CSecondary syphilis
- DPrimary syphilis
Show answerHide answer
Answer: A · Early latent syphilis
The reactive EIA and RPR confirm untreated syphilis, and a normal examination with no chancre, rash or mucosal lesion makes it latent. By CDC definitions, latent syphilis is early when it was acquired within the past 12 months, and documented seroconversion within that time is one way to show this. His EIA was nonreactive 9 months ago, so he has early latent syphilis, treated with a single dose of benzathine penicillin G. Late latent syphilis, or latent syphilis of unknown duration, is used when the infection cannot be dated to the past year, and it needs three weekly doses. Primary syphilis needs a chancre and secondary syphilis needs skin, mucosal or lymph node signs, none of which he has.
- B: Late latent applies when infection cannot be dated to the past 12 months, but his test was nonreactive 9 months ago.
- C: Secondary syphilis has rash, mucosal lesions or lymphadenopathy, which he does not have.
- D: Primary syphilis needs a chancre, and none was found.