Question 1 · Hard
A 26-year-old man attends a sexual health clinic with a painless, clean-based ulcer on the penis that appeared 6 days ago, and firm, painless inguinal nodes. The laboratory uses the reverse sequence algorithm. Results: treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay reactive (S/CO 4.6; reactive at 1.0 or more); RPR nonreactive, with a smooth, non-granular reaction; TP-PA nonreactive; Treponema pallidum PCR on a swab of the ulcer detected; fourth-generation HIV screen nonreactive. He has never had syphilis or been treated for it. What is the best interpretation?
- APast syphilis that has been treated
- BSecondary syphilis with an RPR prozone
- CA false-positive treponemal screening test
- DEarly primary syphilis that needs treatment now
Show answerHide answer
Answer: D · Early primary syphilis that needs treatment now
Early in primary syphilis antibodies are only just appearing, and a treponemal immunoassay that detects IgM as well as IgG is often the first test to turn reactive, while the RPR and even the TP-PA can still be nonreactive. Applied without the clinical picture, a reactive screen with a nonreactive TP-PA would usually be called a false-positive screen, but a typical chancre and a positive lesion PCR prove the infection. He has never been treated, and treated past syphilis would leave the TP-PA reactive. Prozone occurs with the very high antibody levels of secondary syphilis and gives a granular RPR, which does not fit a 6-day ulcer. He should be treated today without waiting for repeat serology, and his partners notified.
- A: He was never treated, and past syphilis would leave the TP-PA reactive.
- B: Prozone needs the high antibody levels of secondary syphilis, not a 6-day ulcer.
- C: The chancre and positive lesion PCR prove infection despite the nonreactive TP-PA.