Question 1 · Hard
During a busy endoscopy list, a technologist assists the pathologist at grossing. To save time, she labels the cassettes for the next two cases in advance, opens both formalin containers together and sets them side by side. Case A's requisition reads 'gastric antrum, 2 biopsies'; case B's reads 'sigmoid colon, 5 biopsies'. The dictated gross descriptions read 'case A: five fragments' and 'case B: two fragments', and both containers are now empty. At embedding the next morning, the histotechnologist finds five fragments in cassette A and two in cassette B. What should the histotechnologist do?
- AAsk both endoscopy teams to repeat the biopsies
- BSwap the two cassette labels to match the requests
- CEmbed both as labeled and flag them at sign-out
- DHold both cases and inform the pathologist at once
Show answerHide answer
Answer: D · Hold both cases and inform the pathologist at once
Each cassette holds the number of fragments listed on the other patient's requisition, which points to a switch at grossing, when two containers were open at the same time with cassettes labeled in advance. A suspected identification error is a serious nonconformity: work on both cases stops, and the pathologist is told before any slide is cut or reported. Laboratory staff must not relabel blocks on their own, because a count mismatch is strong evidence but not proof; the pathologist leads the investigation using the gross records, the endoscopy reports and, if needed, DNA identity testing. Repeat biopsies are a last resort if the identity cannot be resolved. The lasting fix is to gross one specimen at a time, matching container, requisition and cassette before the next container is opened.
- A: Repeat biopsies are considered only if the investigation cannot resolve the identity.
- B: Relabeling on an assumption could fix the error wrongly and hides it from the investigation.
- C: Embedding and reporting as labeled risks issuing each patient's result under the other's name.