Question 1 · Hard
During a semiannual performance check of a photometer used for NADH methods at 340 nm, certified absorbance standards of 0.500, 1.000, 1.500 and 2.000 read 0.486, 0.946, 1.338 and 1.609. The blank reads 0.000 in a new cuvette. A holmium oxide filter shows its peaks within 0.5 nm of their certified wavelengths. A sharp cut-off filter that transmits no light below about 400 nm reads 1.5% transmittance at the 340 nm setting. The most likely cause of the linearity failure is:
- AAn error in wavelength calibration
- BA dirty or scratched cuvette window
- CFading of the absorbance standards
- DStray light reaching the detector
Show answerHide answer
Answer: D · Stray light reaching the detector
The error grows with absorbance, from about 3% low at 0.500 to 20% low at 2.000, a negative deviation from Beer's law that is typical of stray light. When a sample absorbs most of the intended light, a small amount of unwanted light reaching the detector becomes a large share of the signal, so the measured transmittance is too high and the absorbance too low. The cut-off filter confirms this: it should pass no light at 340 nm, yet the detector sees 1.5% transmittance. The holmium oxide peaks rule out a wavelength error; the optics should be cleaned or serviced, and results limited to the range that passes the linearity check until then.
- A: The holmium oxide peaks are in the right places, so the wavelength scale is correct.
- B: A dirty cuvette adds absorbance, and the new cuvette blanks at zero.
- C: Fading would lower every standard by about the same percentage, not more at high absorbance.