Question 1 · Hard
A laboratory establishes its own adult reference interval for serum GGT from 120 healthy volunteers, after excluding people with liver disease, heavy alcohol use or enzyme-inducing drugs. Summary of the results: mean 31 U/L, SD 18 U/L, median 25 U/L, mode 21 U/L; lowest value 6 U/L, highest 112 U/L; 2.5th percentile 9 U/L, 97.5th percentile 78 U/L. A histogram shows a long tail toward high values. A colleague proposes reporting the mean ± 2 SD. Which reference interval should the laboratory adopt?
- A6 to 112 U/L, the full range of the 120 results
- B9 to 78 U/L, from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles
- C0 to 67 U/L, the mean ± 2 SD with negatives set to 0
- D13 to 49 U/L, the mean ± 1 SD of the results
Show answerHide answer
Answer: B · 9 to 78 U/L, from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles
The mean is higher than the median, which is higher than the mode, and the mean minus 2 SD (31 - 36 = -5 U/L) falls below zero, so the data are skewed to the right and not Gaussian. Parametric limits would give an impossible lower limit and an upper limit of 67 U/L that labels too many healthy people as high. CLSI EP28 recommends the nonparametric method for such data: the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of at least 120 reference subjects form the central 95% interval. Alternatively, the data could be log-transformed to a near-Gaussian shape before parametric limits are calculated.
- A: The full range includes the extreme values and covers more than the central 95% of healthy people.
- C: The mean ± 2 SD assumes Gaussian data; here it gives a negative lower limit and cuts off healthy high values.
- D: The mean ± 1 SD covers only about two-thirds of healthy people, even in Gaussian data.