Question 1 · Hard
A 71-year-old man with COPD on 2 L/min nasal oxygen has a pulse oximetry reading of 88%. His arterial sample is drawn into a dry, balanced-heparin syringe and arrives by pneumatic tube with a large air bubble and froth at the tip; it is analyzed 10 minutes after collection. Results: pH 7.50, pCO2 44 mm Hg [5.9 kPa], pO2 104 mm Hg [13.9 kPa], HCO3- 33 mmol/L. Two days earlier, on the same oxygen and with the same oximetry reading, his results were pH 7.39, pCO2 60 mm Hg [8.0 kPa], pO2 56 mm Hg [7.5 kPa], HCO3- 35 mmol/L. The most likely explanation for today's results is:
- ARoom air mixing with the sample in the syringe
- BGlycolysis during a delay in analysis
- CVenous blood drawn instead of arterial
- DAcute improvement in his ventilation
Show answerHide answer
Answer: A · Room air mixing with the sample in the syringe
A pO2 of 104 mm Hg cannot be right in a patient whose oximetry still reads 88%, which matches a pO2 in the mid-50s, as it did two days ago. Room air has a pO2 of about 150 mm Hg and almost no CO2, so a large bubble shaken in a pneumatic tube pulls pO2 up and pCO2 down, and pH rises as CO2 leaves the sample. Bicarbonate changes little when CO2 escapes, which is why it stays near his usual value while pCO2 falls by 16 mm Hg. A real improvement in ventilation would also raise the oximetry reading, a venous sample would give a lower pO2 and a higher pCO2, and glycolysis during a delay lowers pH and pO2. The sample should be rejected and redrawn, with bubbles expelled at once and the syringe capped.
- B: Glycolysis lowers pH and pO2 and raises pCO2, the opposite of what is seen.
- C: Venous blood would show a lower pO2 and a higher pCO2, not the reverse.
- D: Better ventilation would raise the oximetry reading too, but it is unchanged at 88%.