Question 1 · Hard
A 64-year-old man with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is monitored for pump thrombosis, which raises LD. Three samples over 2 days, including one drawn by an experienced phlebotomist through a straight needle, all have pink plasma and a free hemoglobin of about 180 mg/dL [1.8 g/L]. The laboratory's rule suppresses LD when free hemoglobin exceeds 50 mg/dL [0.5 g/L]. Latest results: LD 1,480 U/L (reference 125-220), potassium 4.3 mmol/L, AST 64 U/L (below 40), haptoglobin below 10 mg/dL [0.1 g/L], reticulocytes 4.2%. What should the laboratory do?
- AReport LD as falsely raised by in vitro hemolysis
- BReport LD with a comment on in vivo hemolysis
- CSuppress LD and request another recollection
- DApply a hemolysis correction factor to LD
Show answerHide answer
Answer: B · Report LD with a comment on in vivo hemolysis
Hemolysis in the tube releases red cell potassium and LD together, so in vitro hemolysis usually raises potassium. Here potassium is normal, haptoglobin is absent, reticulocytes are raised and three carefully drawn samples look the same, so the hemolysis is happening in the circulation (in vivo), as is common with LVADs. Recollecting cannot remove it, and the raised LD is the patient's true value, which is exactly what the clinicians need to detect pump thrombosis. The laboratory should report the LD with a comment that the sample shows in vivo hemolysis, rather than apply a correction formula. Rules that suppress hemolyzed results need an exception for this situation.
- A: Normal potassium, absent haptoglobin and identical draws show the hemolysis happened in the patient.
- C: Three careful draws gave the same result; another will too, and the clinical answer is lost.
- D: Correction formulas are unreliable and not recommended; this LD is real circulating LD.