Question 1 · Hard
A 26-year-old man has had 5 days of nausea, fatigue and dark urine. ALT is 1,620 U/L (reference below 40 U/L), and serum total bilirubin is 2.0 mg/dL [34 µmol/L], of which 1.3 mg/dL [22 µmol/L] is direct (conjugated). A fresh urine kept away from light gives: SG 1.022, pH 6.0, bilirubin pad negative, urobilinogen 3 EU/dL (reference below 1.0 EU/dL), ascorbic acid pad negative. Strip QC is acceptable. An Ictotest on the same urine turns the mat blue-purple within 60 seconds, and its positive and negative controls are acceptable. The best interpretation of these results is:
- AA false-positive tablet test from pigment
- BUnconjugated bilirubin found by the tablet
- CBilirubin below the pad's detection limit
- DBilirubin destroyed by light before the strip
Show answerHide answer
Answer: C · Bilirubin below the pad's detection limit
The Ictotest uses the same diazo reaction as the strip pad but detects about 0.05 to 0.1 mg/dL of bilirubin, compared with about 0.4 to 0.8 mg/dL for most pads. Early in hepatitis, conjugated bilirubin can be present in the urine below the pad's limit, so the more sensitive tablet test is positive. The raised direct bilirubin and urobilinogen fit hepatocellular injury, which lets conjugated bilirubin back into the blood and then into the urine. The tablet test is also less affected by interfering substances than the pad. The urine bilirubin should be reported as positive by the Ictotest.
- A: A true positive is blue to purple, pigments give other colors, and the controls are acceptable.
- B: Unconjugated bilirubin is bound to albumin, is not filtered, and does not appear in urine.
- D: The urine was protected from light, and photo-oxidation would have made the Ictotest negative too.