Question 1 · Hard
A 31-year-old woman has severe abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation and weakness of both arms after several days of fasting. The laboratory is comparing two strip brands and tests her fresh urine on both at the same time. Strip A, whose urobilinogen pad uses p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (Ehrlich reagent), reads 8 EU/dL [about 135 µmol/L]. Strip B, whose urobilinogen pad uses a diazonium salt, reads 0.2 EU/dL [about 3.4 µmol/L]; the reference is below 1.0 EU/dL. Bilirubin is negative on both strips, serum bilirubin and ALT are normal, and her hemoglobin is normal with no sign of hemolysis. What best explains the different urobilinogen results?
- APorphobilinogen reacting with the Ehrlich pad
- BUrobilinogen oxidized before strip B was read
- CMore urobilinogen from hidden hemolysis
- DBilirubin blocking the diazonium pad reaction
Show answerHide answer
Answer: A · Porphobilinogen reacting with the Ehrlich pad
The Ehrlich reagent reacts with urobilinogen but also with other Ehrlich-reactive compounds, including porphobilinogen. A diazonium (azo-coupling) urobilinogen pad is more specific for urobilinogen and does not react with porphobilinogen. A high Ehrlich result with a normal diazonium result, normal bilirubin and no hemolysis therefore points to an Ehrlich-reactive substance other than urobilinogen. With abdominal pain and weakness after fasting, that substance is most likely porphobilinogen from an attack of acute intermittent porphyria. Neither strip is a reliable test for porphobilinogen, so a specific urine porphobilinogen test should be requested at once.
- B: Both strips were dipped at the same time, so oxidation cannot explain the difference between them.
- C: Hemolysis raises true urobilinogen, which the specific diazonium pad would also detect, and there is no hemolysis.
- D: Bilirubin is negative on both strips, so it cannot be interfering.