Question 1 · Hard
A healthy 47-year-old man has a thick, yellow, crumbling great toenail. Nail clippings are examined with calcofluor white and KOH under fluorescence. The technologist sees several brightly fluorescent strands that are flat, about 15 to 20 µm wide and even in width, twisted at intervals along their length, with no cross walls, no branching and no conidia. They lie on top of the nail fragments, and no fluorescent elements are seen within the keratin itself. Fungal cultures on media with and without cycloheximide have no growth at 4 weeks. The fluorescent strands are best interpreted as:
- ACandida pseudohyphae invading the nail
- BCotton fibers, not fungal elements
- CDermatophyte hyphae; culture falsely negative
- DBroad, sparsely septate Mucorales hyphae
Show answerHide answer
Answer: B · Cotton fibers, not fungal elements
Calcofluor white binds beta-linked polysaccharides, chitin and cellulose, so it lights up fungal walls but also cotton, paper and plant fibers. These strands are far too wide for dermatophyte hyphae, which are 2 to 4 µm across, and their even width, flat twisted form and lack of septa or branching are the look of cotton. Dermatophyte hyphae lie within the keratin, are septate and branched, and often break into arthroconidia, while Candida pseudohyphae show constrictions at the septa. Mucorales hyphae vary in width, branch at wide angles, rarely infect nails and would grow within days on media without cycloheximide. The smear is reported as negative for fungal elements, which agrees with the culture.
- A: Pseudohyphae are narrow chains with constrictions at the septa, not 15-20 µm strands.
- C: Dermatophyte hyphae are 2-4 µm wide, septate and branched, and lie within the keratin.
- D: Mucorales hyphae branch and vary in width, and would grow within days on media without cycloheximide.